Freedom of information (FOI) releases from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)

This is a disclosure log of UK Research and Innovation's responses to freedom of information (FOI) or environmental information regulations (EIR) requests that might be of wider public interest.

If you can't find the information you're looking for, you can make a new FOI request.

Filters

Clear filters
  • Keywords filters

  • Year filters

  • Month filters

1,376 disclosures

  1. Request Received: 27 February 2026

    [Part A] Please provide aggregate data for the most recent five completed competition years (ideally 2021–2025 inclusive) for the MRC Clinician Scientist Fellowship, including applications submitted under the opportunity titled “Clinician scientist fellowship” and/or “Early independence: clinician scientist fellowship” (or any direct successor/renamed listing for the same scheme).

    Using existing internal classification fields only (no creation of new data), please identify applications relevant to ophthalmology and vision research, including where available: ophthalmology, vision science, retina, glaucoma, cornea/ocular surface, uveitis/ocular inflammation, ophthalmic imaging, ocular genetics, ocular AI, and regenerative ophthalmology/vision regeneration.

    For those ophthalmology/vision-relevant applications, please provide by competition year:

    1. Number of applications submitted

    2. Number funded

    3. Median of total cost requested

    4. Median of total cost awarded

    Please also provide the same items 1–4 for the scheme overall (all subjects) for the same years, to allow comparison.

    Additional Request Received: 1 March 2026

    [Part B] Please provide aggregate data for the MRC Clinician Scientist Fellowship (including any “Early independence: clinician scientist fellowship” listing or direct successor) covering the most recent 12 months of completed funding decisions (i.e., decision dates within the last 12 months).

    I am seeking to understand whether recorded collaboration patterns are associated with funding success. Please provide an aggregated contingency table showing, for applications decided in the last 12 months, the number of funded and not funded applications in each of the following categories (excluding the lead applicant):

    1. 0 co-applicants / co-investigators

    2. 1 co-applicant / co-investigator

    3. 2 co-applicants / co-investigators

    4. 3+ co-applicants / co-investigators

    For each category, please provide:

    • number of applications funded

    • number of applications not funded

    • the resulting success rate (funded / total)

    Published: 11 May 2026

  2. Request Received: 28 February 2026

    In your annual financial reports (for example, https://www.ukri.org/publications/annual-report-and-accounts-2024-to-2025/, p140) you make reference to ‘separate financial information’ for operating segments. Could you provide me this information, for each operating segment, separated into sufficient granularity such that it is possible to identify the expenditure on individual named funding calls/initiatives, capital expenditure, facilities costs (including overheads, upgrades, staffing costs, etc, specific to individual facilities), as well as UKRI centralised overheads and staffing costs? I would like this information from 2018-2019 to (and including) 2024-2025.

    Published: 11 May 2026

  3. Request received: 10 February 2026

    I am submitting a request under the Freedom of Information Act for details relating to your current IT Service Management (ITSM) solution.

    Please provide:

    1. The name of the current ITSM supplier and product in use.

    2. The contract start date and contract expiry date.

    3. Any extension options available within the contract.

    4. The total contract value, where available and procurement framework used (if applicable)

    5. The expected timeline or plans for re-procurement, if known.

    6. Number of licensed agents or users on the platform

    7. Departments or services currently using the ITSM solution

    Published: 11 May 2026

  4. Request Received: 10 April 2026

    For Innovate UK's Battery Innovation Programme Round 1 competition, please could you release the following information for the Feasibility Studies strand:

    1.      The number of applications submitted.
    2.      The number of assessed applications.
    3.      The number of successful applications.
    4.      The success rate.
    5.      The minimum successful score.
    6.      The maximum successful score.
    7.      The maximum score of failed applications.
    8.      The average grant fund value per project.
    9.      The average score of funded projects.
    10.     The average number of partners within consortiums for successful applications.
    11.     The count of assessed applications by theme (Theme 1: UK equipment manufacturing and process capability for cell and battery production, Theme 2: UK battery reuse, recovery and recycling, Theme 3:  UK battery sector with localised battery supply chain and industrial resilience). If it is the case that some applicants submitted under more than one theme, please capture the most popular theme submitted into.
    12.     The count of successful applications by theme. If it is the case that some applicants were successful under more than one theme, please capture the most popular theme funded.
    13.     The number of unsuccessful applications, if any, which scored above the minimum funded score.

    Published: 8 May 2026

  5. Request Received: 10 April 2026

    For Innovate UK's Battery Innovation Programme Round 1 competition, please could you release the following information for the Concept Development strand:


    1.      The number of applications submitted.
    2.      The number of assessed applications.
    3.      The number of successful applications.
    4.      The success rate.
    5.      The minimum successful score.
    6.      The maximum successful score.
    7.      The maximum score of failed applications.
    8.      The average grant fund value per project.
    9.      The average score of funded projects.
    10.     The average number of partners within consortiums for successful applications.
    11.     The count of assessed applications by theme (Theme 1: UK equipment manufacturing and process capability for cell and battery production, Theme 2: UK battery reuse, recovery and recycling, Theme 3:  UK battery sector with localised battery supply chain and industrial resilience). If it is the case that some applicants submitted under more than one theme, please capture the most popular theme submitted into.
    12.     The count of successful applications by theme. If it is the case that some applicants were successful under more than one theme, please capture the most popular theme funded.
    13.     The number of unsuccessful applications, if any, which scored above the minimum funded score.

    Published: 8 May 2026

  6. Request Received: 9 April 2026

    I would like to make a FOI request. This relates to the Hartree Centre, a department of STFC. Please could you provide:

    1. The total revenue to STFC/UKRI from Hartree Centre's 'Platform-as-a-Service' (PaaS) offering in the 2024/2025 financial year.

    2. The split of the PaaS revenue in that year across the Hartree Centre's compute platforms, such as 'Scafell Pike'.

    3. The total number of customers invoiced for PaaS in that financial year generating that revenue.

    Published: 6 May 2026

  7. Request received: 08 April 2026

    Please may I request the minutes for item 6 'Reforming UKRI' at the November 2025 UKRI board meeting that were withheld from publication in the published minutes:

    https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/UKRI-240326-BoardMeetingMinutesNovember2025.pdf

    Published: 6 May 2026

  8. Request received: 11 March 2026

    I am requesting all reports from 2019 onward related to Project CESIUM.

    This was funded by Innovate UK and awarded to Trilateral Research, Lincolnshire Police and the NWG Exploitation Response Unit. The reports should include project and financial reports.

    Published: 1 May 2026

  9. Request Received: 20 February 2026

    Please could you provide the date on which the Innovate UK grant applications were submitted for the projects involving the following organisations:

    • James Mae Water

    • Aspcold Manufacturing

    If more than one application exists involving these organisations, I would be grateful if you could provide the application date(s) for each relevant grant, along with the grant title or competition name. I do not require any commercially sensitive information beyond the application submission date.

    Published: 29 April 2026

  10. Request Received: 22 February 2026

    I contacted the author of this published paper (https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/12280) requesting a copy of the data many years back and it was refused.

    It states in the paper:

     "compilation of isotopic datasets by the British Geological Survey (BGS) over the past 25 years combined with (relatively scarce) published studies by other researchers makes it possible for the present paper to attempt a synthesis.”

    And in the acknowledgements:

     "Most of the groundwater data considered in this paper have come from studies carried out by staff of the British Geological Survey over the past quarter-century.”

    Could the BGS please provide all the oxygen and hydrogen isotope data for groundwater and surface water that the BGS contain?

    Published: 29 April 2026