Freedom of information (FOI) releases from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)

This is a disclosure log of UK Research and Innovation's responses to freedom of information (FOI) or environmental information regulations (EIR) requests that might be of wider public interest.

If you can't find the information you're looking for, you can make a new FOI request.

Filters

Clear filters
  • Keywords filters

  • Year filters

  • Month filters

1,137 disclosures

  1. Request Received: 18 October 2024

    I would like to understand from the 16 rounds so far, how many Innovation Loans have been issued since the start of the programme in March 2022.

    Breakdown this information based on:

    1) How many total applicants in all 16 rounds

    2) How many applicant proposals have been considered in scope and were fully evaluated

    3) How many applicants have been evaluated by the Innovate UK finance team

    4) How many applicants have been awarded the loan

    5) How many projects have started

    6) The UK regions in which these projects are located

    7) The average value of the loan awarded

    8) How much total has been paid out in loans to applicants

    9) How much total of loans have since been repaid

    Published: 14 November 2024

  2. Request received: 3 September 2024

    We are reaching out regarding the recent Women in Innovation grant/award, for which we understand you received 1,452 applications. We are requesting the following information:

    1. Breakdown of Applicants by Race in a table format: Please provide a breakdown of the 1,452 applicants by race.

    2. Breakdown of Awardees by Race (Initial 25): We understand that initially, only 25 awards were granted. Could you please provide the racial breakdown of these 25 awardees?

    3. Breakdown of Awardees by Race (Additional 25): We also understand that after reconsideration, you decided to honor the full 50 awards. Please provide the racial breakdown of the additional 25 awardees.

    Published: 13 November 2024

  3. Request Received: 17 September 2024

    I would like to request the information below:

    The MRC welcomes good quality research on ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis) but few studies get funded.

    What is the decision process of what studies get funded?

    Who sits on the decision boards (names and positions)?

    I would like this information to cover the years from 2010 to 2024.

    Clarification Received: 24 October 2024

    I understand that the 2010 to 2024 scope would mean too many studies and reviewers.

    Can I ask instead:

    How many applications did the MRC get in the last 5 years for studies on ME/CFS (both successful and unsuccessful)?

    What were the studies names and their authors?

    Who were the reviewers? Which studies were successful?

    Published: 13 November 2024

  4. Request Received: 11 October 2024

    Dear Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, The information that we require is as follows:-

    1) Do you use a social media management platform?

    2) If so, what tools do you use?

    3) What is your annual spend on a Social media management tool?

    4) What dates does your contract with your current supplier end ( month & year) ?

    5)Do you use a social listening / media monitoring platform?

    6) If so, what tools do you use?

    7) What is your annual spend on a social listening / media monitoring tool?

    8) What dates does your contract with your current supplier end ( month & year)

    9) Who is the senior person responsible for managing these contracts?

    Published: 8 November 2024

  5. Request Received: 26 July 2024

    Please release the data of the last 5 years about BBSRC panel A success rate.

    These data should be broken down into each year's call (e.g. 24RM1) and indicate the success rate of the funded grants for both normal and new investigators.

    Please also release the adopted procedures from Panel A about the choice of the reviewers and the choice of the number of reviewers, e.g. a minimum of 3 reviewers and the inclusion on an additional reviewer up to a total of 5 if there is substantial disagreement between the first 3 reviewers.

    Please indicate the instructions the Panel uses to interpret the reviews (e.g. length of review, keywords etc.).

    Please indicate the weight system used to assign to each review on a given grant.

    Published: 7 November 2024

  6. Request Received: 30 July 2024

    1. What software you are currently using to facilitate BACS payments & what is the date of the renewal for this contract?

    1. How much you are paying annually for this contract, and where do you advertise for this tender?

    This is to identify tender opportunities, please provide the information in the form of an email.

    Published: 7 November 2024

  7. Request Received: 29 July 2024

    I would like to request the following details for the recent Bilateral and Cooperation 2024 grant rounds including:

    • UK-Switzerland Bilateral: Collaborative R&D Round

    • UK-Germany Bilateral: Collaborative R&D

    • UK-Taiwan CRD

    • UK-South Korea CR&D

    For those competitions above, I would like to know:

    • The number of applications/entries per round

    • The number of applications per industry/sector, if possible too

    Thank you in advance, and my most pressing request is for the number of applications per round.

    Published: 7 November 2024

  8. Request Received: 14 August 2024

    1. The number of applications.

    2. The number of assessed applications.

    3. The number of successful applications.

    4. The success rate.

    5. The minimum successful score.

    6. The maximum successful score.

    7. Maximum score of failed applications.

    8. Average loan value per project.

    9. Average score of funded projects.

    10. The score distributions of the applications (e.g. % (or number) of applications which scored <70, 70.1-75, 75.1-80, 80.1-85, 85.1-90, 90.1-95, 95.1-100).

    11. The count of assessed applications by innovation area.

    12. The count of successful projects by innovation area for each strand.

    13. The number of unsuccessful applications, if any, which scored above the minimum funded score.

    Published: 7 November 2024

  9. Request Received: 31 August 2024

    Innovate UK Women In Innovation Competition 2024

    I would like to make a request for the following information:

    1) threshold funding pass rate for the 'portfolio approach' for the county of Essex (CB10 1AX) for this competition in 2024

    2) demographics of the assessors (specifically the age and gender identity of the assessors) who scored in the Innovate UK Women in Innovation award 2024, including any demographics held on assessors who identify on the neurodivergent scale and/or disclosed as disabled.

    3) training process all Innovate UK assessors attend on EDI matters and whether this is mandatory or not, including procedures to recruit assessors with disabilities and/or on the neurodivergent spectrum and how this fits in with the wider EDI strategy across UKRI since January 2023.

    Published: 5 November 2024

  10. Request received: 22 July 2024

    I want to thank you and you team once again for working with me to help understand the under-representation of Black and minority ethnic colleagues on UKRI decision-making committees. You might be aware that this data, and my conclusions and recommendations, were used to inform a written evidence submission[1] to the Diversity in STEM Inquiry of the Science and Technology Select Committee of the House of Commons.

     

    The Committee’s responses to my submission, my discussion with them, and their recommendations, are available here[2].

    Since some time has passed, I’m writing to let you know that I am conducting an impact study, the aim of which is to evaluate UKRIs response, and to assess the ways in which representation might have changed as a result of UKRI activities, and to understand the causal links between UKRI actions and outcomes (please note for reference that this impact study has been approved by Royal Holloways Research Ethics Committee; reference ID: 369).

    Freedom of Information Request

    1. Data for 2020/21 to 2023/24 I would be grateful if you could please provide the following data. For new to be comparable with previous data, please replicate the data tables in Freedom of Information requests FOI2022/00244 and FOI2021/00376, and making the same assumptions and using the same measures, supply data for the subsequent period, financial years 2020/21 to 2023/24.

    2. In the Parliamentary evidence submission mentioned above, the following recommendations were made:

    I. “UKRI leadership needs to develop a clear vision of what proportionate representation and inclusion should look like among UKRI decision-makers, coherently across RCs. The development of this vision requires the guidance of stakeholders with lived experience of marginalisation and scholars with specific research expertise.”

    II..“The final version of UKRI’s recently published draft Equality, Diversity and Inclusion strategy needs to commit to monitoring, publicly reporting on, and ending underrepresentation in its decision-making structures, beginning with its leadership teams and including all of its committees. This programme of work also needs to be properly resourced.”

    III. “A set of coherent, evidence-based, specific and time-bound actions needs to be developed that aims to understand the causes of under-representation among decision-makers, that increases diversity and inclusion, and uses evidence to check that actions have impact.”

    IV. “Guidance to staff in all RCs needs to include a requirement to ensure, at the very least, the proportionate participation of ethnic minorities. Adherence to this and other requirements needs to be monitored.”

    V. “UKRI should put to actual use the ethnicity (and other) data that it collects relating to its decision-making structures, and do so in a routine, timely and transparent manner.”

    Although RCs are represented within UKRI leadership structures, it is important to consider the decisions made by both UKRI as a body with overarching responsibilities over RCs, and by RCs individually. It would be useful for the impact analysis to consider whether or not the recommendations above have implemented by each. In a table, please note ‘Yes’ where recommendations have been implemented.

     

    In those cases, please provide written evidence of internal decision-making leading to implementation. For example in the case of (IV), please supply any updated written guidance to UKRI staff on committee building since the date of FOI2021/00376. Please also supply internal correspondence and minutes of meetings which make reference to the written evidence submission mentioned. For each remaining cell, please provide state reasons for not implementing recommendations.

    1. UKRI and RC Committee Meeting Dates and Minutes I would like to understand decision-making and actions emerging from UKRIs overarching, principal EDI Committee (2015/16 to 2023/34), and also the relationship between its actions and my evidence report. It may be impractical to send to me the minutes of all committee meetings in this period, so if you could please send me the dates of all meetings for this committee for now, it will allow me to select the meeting dates that would be the most appropriate.

    2. Records referring to evidence submission Please could you send to me minutes of meetings in UKRI (including RCs), and any internal correspondence, in which the evidence submission has been mentioned? This will allow me to understand the context in which it has been discussed.

    Clarification Received: 13 August 2024

    You’ve requested a timeframe for the information in parts 2, 3 and 4. I assume that UKRI and RCs would have begun considering evidence from at least the time of my first FoI, the response to which which is dated 31/07/2020 so I think that serves as a reasonable start date. The original date of my current request to you could serve as an appropriate end date for this period (22/07/2024). This covers nearly four years. I apologise for not specifying this information to you previously.

    Published: 4 November 2024