Freedom of information (FOI) releases from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)

This is a disclosure log of UK Research and Innovation's responses to freedom of information (FOI) or environmental information regulations (EIR) requests that might be of wider public interest.

If you can't find the information you're looking for, you can make a new FOI request.

Filters

Clear filters
  • Sort by filters

  • Keywords filters

  • Year filters

  • Month filters

1,058 disclosures

  1. Request Received 1 October 2020

    I would like information pertaining to:

    1. The way in which assessors are selected and their expertise/credentials to review applications are vetted

    2. How they are assigned to applications

    3. The way in which assessors are briefed in relation to funding calls, as well as specifically in relation to the SIF SBRI call

    4. How their assessments (across all calls) are checked for accuracy (both in relation to assessment against the scope of the call, as well as in relation to their assessment of a particular issue within an application) and how within a particular call those assessments are checked

    5. How assessments within a call are moderated between sectors (recognising that assessors for any 2 particular applications may vary completely)

    6. How assessments between calls and sectors are moderated

    7. The legal structure under which the funding is awarded and the obligations under which Innovate UK awards that funding (e.g. obligations for accuracy, etc.)

    8. The framework under which the SIF SBRI competition is held, the guidance given to assessors and the way in which the assessments are conducted and normalised across sectors, the way in which the core team ensures that the assessments are in accordance with the scope of the call.

    I'm looking for information, reports, guidance, briefings, processes, that are associated with preventing and correcting errors within the assessment process.

    Of particular interest is the way in which assessments are checked to verify they are conducted in accordance with the scope of the call.

    Published: 15 June 2021

  2. Request Received: 17 November 2020

    I would like to request the entire UKRI disclosure log from the last 3 years.

    I realise some of this is online, but I would like to receive the full version without any abridged information.

    Published: 14 June 2021

  3. Request Received: 3 October 2020

    Please would you provide details of all Innovate UK contracts with the 'Big Four' consultancies (PcW, Deloitte, EY and KPMG) in the last 3 years, also what the work was for, when was it delivered or is planned to be delivered and how much it cost.

    Published: 14 June 2021

  4. Request Received 19 November 2020

    Please could you give me a list of the individuals on the REF2021 panels and sub-panels who are considered to have forensic science expertise.

    Published: 14 June 2021

  5. Request Received: 24 November 2020

    I am seeking information as to the process and procedures and specifically the criteria applied by the Henry Royce Institute (https://www.royce.ac.uk) to select or determine the members of the advisory panel convened to create the document M4ET Caloric Energy Conversion Materials.

    https://www.royce.ac.uk/content/uploads/2020/10/M4ET-Caloric-Energy-Conversion-Materials-roadmap.pdf

    I am really seeking to understand the criteria used to select industrial partners, and how this managed to get reduced to one single micro-company out of the many other possibilities, and to better understand how this situation could have arisen.

    The individuals involved in the selection process will likely include:

    • Dr Xavier Moya, University of Cambridge (lead author)

    • Professor Neil Alford, Imperial College London / Henry Royce Institute (representative of the Royce on the panel).

    This will have been in process prior to March 20, 2020 (the date of the first advisory panel meeting) likely covering the period up to 9 months prior to this date.

    Published: 11 June 2021

  6. Request Received: 16 October 2020

    We are writing to request information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

    CACI Limited is interested in certain information held by your organisation regarding proposal sent by Made Tech Limited and/or contract(s) entered into by your organisation and Made Tech Limited in the last 3 years.

    As part of your response, please can you include the following information relating to Made Tech Limited:-

    1.Copies of any contracts with Made Tech Limited and your organisation entered into in the last 3 years

    2.Details of any frameworks pursuant to which such contract(s) was/were entered into or else, terms and conditions of such contract(s) (E.g. G-Cloud 11).

    3.Copied of any proposal received from made Tech Limited (e.g. any proposals submitted relating to any tender process)

    4.Details of any monies paid or to be paid during the term of any such contract(s) referred in point 1 above.

    5.Details of any notice period for termination served by you on Made Tech Limited under such contract(s).

    6.Renewal options, if any, under such contract(s).

    7.Day rates per grade of Made Tech Limited' staff allocated to provision of services pursuant to such contract(s).

    8.Details of Made Tech Limited' staff allocated to provision of services pursuant to such contract(s).

    9.Any tender responses where Made Tech Limited has indicated where it has any legal disputes relating to any of its staff.

    Published: 10 June 2021

  7. Request Received: 5 November 2020

    Please kindly provide us with the scores, project ID number, project title, project duration and funds supported with for all the successful and unsuccessful applications to the January 2020 and April 2019 Smart Grant competitions.

    We would also like to know how much the total allocated fund for each competition was when it was first advertised.

    It would be also useful for us to see the public summary of the successful applications for both of the above requested SMART rounds.

    Published: 8 June 2021

  8. Request Received: 12 November 2020

    We at i5invest are publishing the European Venture Capital & Private Equity Map reporting on Europe's most active investors 2020.

    Considering your activities this year we'd like to feature you in the report and wanted to quickly verify some information.

    Could you please share a number on your total European AuM as well as your total number of European investments in 2020 (including the ones you're yet to close this year)?

    The European Venture Capital & Private Equity Map will be published towards the end of the year - we're looking forward to featuring you with a company profile and will make sure to send over a copy of the report as well.

    Published: 7 June 2021

  9. Request Received: 4 December 2020

    Please can you supply the list of competition winners from phase 1 =The Sustainable Innovation Fund: SBRI phase 1.

    Published: 4 June 2021

  10. Request Received: 30 November 2020

    I am currently researching if any paper documents are currently being archived and would be most grateful if you would provide me, under the Freedom of Information Act, details in respect to the contract below.

    The details we require are:

    1. Do you currently have any paper documents in storage?

    2. If any paper documents are currently being stored, would you consider having your documents securely scanned by a reputable UK secure scanning company?

    3. If all of your documents have been securely digitised, do you have any bespoke software to electronically access and manage scanned images?

    4. Who is the senior officer/s (outside of procurement) responsible for the management of physical records?

    Published: 2 June 2021