Freedom of information (FOI) releases from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)

This is a disclosure log of UK Research and Innovation's responses to freedom of information (FOI) or environmental information regulations (EIR) requests that might be of wider public interest.

If you can't find the information you're looking for, you can make a new FOI request.

Filters

Clear filters
  • Keywords filters

  • Year filters

  • Month filters

1,256 disclosures

  1. Request Received: 8 October 2024

    Innovate UK UK-Taiwan CRD 2024

    1. The number of applications.

    2. The number of assessed applications.

    3. The number of successful applications.

    4. The success rate.

    5. The minimum successful score.

    6. The maximum successful score.

    7. Maximum score of failed applications.

    8. The job title or level of the personnel within Innovate UK that are decision makers for the criteria of selection.

    9. The job title or level of the personnel within Innovate UK that follows the selection criteria to make the go/no-go decisions in selection of the winning projects and rejected projects.

    10. The criteria for selection for any projects awarded funding through the portfolio approach.

    11. The criteria for rejection for any projects that scored above threshold, but were rejected as a result of a portfolio approach.

    12. Average grant fund value per project.

    13. Average score of funded projects.

    14. Of the proposed projects that were funded, whether the UK lead partner has been a project lead for any other Innovate UK projects in the last 12 months.

    15. Of the proposed projects that were rejected, whether the UK lead partner has been a project lead for any other Innovate UK projects in the last 12 months.

    16. The score distributions of the applications (e.g. % (or number) of applications which scored <70, 70.1-75, 75.1-80, 80.1-85, 85.1-90, 90.1-95, 95.1-100).

    17. The count of assessed applications by innovation area.

    18. The count of successful projects by innovation area.

    19. The count of assessed applications by research category (feasibility studies, industrial research, experimental development).

    20. The count of successful projects by research category.

    21. The number of unsuccessful applications, if any, which scored above the minimum funded score.

    Published: 1 November 2024

  2. Request received: 23 February 2024

    Please can you provide the following information regarding language services.

    1. Please confirm your overall spend on interpreting, translation and transcription services for the following financial years:

    a. 2021-22

    b. 2022-23

    2. Who is your incumbent supplier(s) for language services? If you have more than one supplier, which services does each one provide to you?

    3. If you have a separate British Sign Language/non-spoken supplier, who is this?

    4. If you have a separate transcription supplier, who is this?

    5. Do you have any in-house interpreters/translators?

    6. When is your current language services contract(s) due to expire, a) without extensions and b) with all possible extensions?

    7. Could you please provide the name, phone number and email address of the contract manager responsible for language services?

    8. Could you please provide the name, phone number and email address of the person responsible for your language services budget?

    9. Could you please provide the following data for 2023:

    a. Total number of face-to-face interpreting assignments (spoken language) and hours completed

    b. Total number of face-to-face interpreting assignments (non-spoken language) and hours completed

    c. Total number of telephone interpreting calls and minutes completed

    d. Total number of video interpreting calls (spoken language) and minutes completed

    e. Total number of video interpreting calls (non-spoken language) and minutes completed

    f. Total number of document translations and words translated

    g. Total number of audio transcriptions and total audio duration

    10. What were your top 20 highest-volume languages for interpreting/translation requests in 2023? Can you please provide the fill rate % you received for the following services in 2023:

    a. Face-to-face interpreting

    b. Telephone interpreting

    c. Video interpreting

    d. Document translation

    e. Audio transcription

    11. What languages has your provider been unable to source in the last 12 months?

    12. Have service credits been applied on your language services contract in the last 12 months? If so, what performance failure was this linked to?

    13. What social value has been delivered as part of this contract in the last 12 months?

    14. If your contract was awarded through a tender process, can you please provide a copy of the winning bidder's tender?

    15. What are your contracted rates for each of the following services?

    a. Spoken face-to-face interpreting: hourly rate

    b. Non-spoken face-to-face interpreting: hourly rate

    c. Telephone interpreting: per minute rate

    d. Spoken video interpreting: per minute rate

    e. Non-spoken video interpreting:

    f. Document translation: per word rate

    g. Audio transcription: per audio minute rate

    16. Has your provider of language services increased their charge rate to you in the last 12 months?

    17. What is the Authority's typical route to market?

    18. Does the Authority currently have any interpreter on wheel devices as part of their current contract? If yes please advise how many and if these are provided free of charge or paid for by the Authority.

    19. Could you please provide the name, phone number and email address of the person responsible for the language services budget?

    20. Could you please provide the name, phone number and email address of the person in charge of procurement for the Authority?

    Published: 31 October 2024

  3. Request Received: 22 August 2024

    Medical Research Council (MRC), The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Innovate UK, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)

    For each of the above 4 councils for 2023 please may I have:

    (1) The total amount granted for research involving, the use of live animals, licenced under ASPA 1986.

    (2) The amounts granted to develop human relevant research which would reduce/replace the use of animals.

    (3) The amounts granted and the number of grants specifically where, in full or part, the less commonly used species of dogs are used or are intended to be used.

    (4) The amounts granted and the number of grants specifically where, in full or part, the less commonly used species of Non- Human Primates are used or are intended to be used. Please may I have the figures for each of the years 2021 - 2023.

    If any on your other councils grant money for research under ASPA 1986 please can I also have figures as above for 2023.

    Published: 30 October 2024

  4. Request received: 14 August 2024

    Under the Freedom of Information Act, I would like to know the following information:

    Please detail the number of staff sent on IT training courses, the name of these courses and the total cost of these training courses each year for the past three years from August to July.

    E.g.

    August 2023- July 2024

    · 15 staff sent on IT training courses

    · Courses included – Advanced Data Skills, Introduction to AI, Cybersecurity Awareness

    · £60,000 spend on IT training courses

    Published: 29 October 2024

  5. Request Received: 21 July 2024

    Clarification Received: 27 August 2024

    I would like to make an FOI request for information relating to the following contract awards:

    GSS24119 - UKRI Office Supplies

    MRC Harwell Data Storage expansion

    Please can you provide a breakdown of the items included in these contracts? For each item, could you provide the following information, preferably in a CSV or Excel file (one sheet per contract):

    1. Product Name

    2. Product Brand

    3. EAN number (where applicable)

    4. SKU number (where applicable)

    5. Manufacturer name

    6. Part Number

    7. Requested Quantity

    8. Price per item

    To be clear, I am not looking for the catalogue of available items in each contract but a list of items that have actually been ordered (to date). Accordingly, are you able to provide the details of the actual items that have been ordered (to date) under these contracts?

    Published: 29 October 2024

  6. Request Received: 30 September 2024

    For Innovate UK’s Innovate UK Smart grants: April 2024 competition both the <18 month <£500k and >18 month streams, please could you release the following information:

    1. The number of applications.

    2. The number of assessed applications.

    3. The number of successful applications.

    4. The success rate.

    5. The minimum successful score.

    6. The maximum successful score.

    7. Maximum score of failed applications.

    8. Average grant fund value per project.

    9. Average score of funded projects.

    10. The score distributions of the applications (e.g. % (or number) of applications which scored <70, 70.1-75, 75.1-80, 80.1-85, 85.1-90, 90.1-95, 95.1-100).

    11. The count of assessed applications by innovation area.

    12. The count of successful projects by innovation area for each strand.

    13. The count of assessed applications by research category (feasibility studies, industrial research, experimental development).

    14. The count of successful projects by research category.

    15. The number of unsuccessful applications, if any, which scored above the minimum funded score.

    Published: 25 October 2024

  7. FOI Request Received: 19 March 2024

    Under the Freedom of Information Act, relating to the period from the start of November 2023 to the end of February 2024, can you please provide:

    1) Any communications which mentioned or relate to the project "DARE UK" ("Data and Analytics Research Environments UK" - Home - DARE UK

    sent by the CEO of MRC (and his office) as sent to Health Data Research UK's CEO (ie Andrew Morris, and his office). Please include attachments within those communications.

    2) Any replies or responses to those communications received by MRC (which may include the investment manager for HDR at MRC in addition to the MRC CEO)

    Internal Review request received: 17 April 2024

    Published: 25 October 2024

  8. Request Received: 11 June and 4 July 2024

    1. Copies of all correspondence relating to IUK case <Redacted>, including minutes of any meetings where all parties to the project were present.

    2. What IUK paid <Redacted> as part of their claims for payment against the work package(s) which included <Redacted>.

    3. A full copy of IUK’s internal reports relating to project controls for project <Redacted>.

    4. What mechanisms IUK employs to ensure that those involved in a failure to meet obligations on past projects cannot access future funds.

    Published: 22 October 2024

  9. Request Received: 20 August 2024

    I am writing to request information regarding how many Kazakhstani nationals are, and have been employed by STFC since 2018 annually?

    Published: 21 October 2024

  10. Request Received: 2 September 2024

    Information required in relation to the ESRC funded report, completed by the IFS, titled ‘Tax, private school fees and state school spending’ (published 11th July 2023). See link: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/tax-private-school-fees-and-state-school-spending

    Date range to cover from first piece of information to most recent.

    Documents, email traffic, minutes, meetings and communications illustrating:

    1. how much was paid to the IFS?

    2. who proposed the work? For example, the ESRC, the IFS or a third party?

    3. which individuals asked for, and signed off, the funding and the work?

    4. who was accountable for the selection of the provider and the quality of the work?

    5. what efforts were made to ensure independent research from an unbiased provider and individuals within it?

    6. which individuals from the IFS were involved in any communications?

    7. who else was considered for the work?

    8. what was the exact remit proposed by / given to the IFS?

    9. what involvement there was from the UKRI (including details of which individuals)?

    10. what involvement there was from the DSIT (including detail of which individuals)?

    11. what involvement there was from parliamentarians, policy makers and government departments (including detail of which individuals)?

    12. were any other third parties involved?

    13. what conflicts-of-interest checks were completed?

    Published: 21 October 2024